By Marc Stevens, Arjen Lenstra, Benne de Weger (auth.), Moni Naor (eds.)
Those are the court cases of Eurocrypt 2007, the twenty sixth Annual IACR EurocryptConference. The convention used to be subsidized via the overseas organization forCryptologic examine (IACR; see www.iacr.org), this yr in cooperation withthe study staff on arithmetic utilized to Cryptography at UPC and theResearch crew on details protection at UMA. The Eurocrypt 2007 ProgramCommittee (PC) consisted of 24 individuals whose names are indexed at the nextpage.The computing device selected a number of regulations: 0 computer papers - no software Committeemember might publish papers; non-compulsory anonymity - authors might decide upon toanonymize their papers or no longer. nameless papers have been handled as traditional, i.e.,the author’s identification was once no longer published to the computer. The submission software program usedwas “Web Submission and overview software program” written and maintained by way of ShaiHalevi. there have been 173 papers submitted to the convention and the computer chose33 of them. every one paper used to be assigned to at the least 3 computing device individuals, who eitherhandled it themselves or assigned it to an exterior referee. After the studies weresubmitted, the committee deliberated either on-line for numerous weeks and finallyin a face-to-face assembly held in Paris. as well as notification of the decisionof the committee, authors acquired experiences. Our objective used to be to supply meaningfulcomments to authors of all papers (both these chosen for this system andthose now not selected). The default for any document given to the committee used to be thatit might be to be had to the authors besides.